The Embarrassment of Riches
Sep. 25th, 2026 02:49 pm17th century Netherlands. All sorts of things.
( Read more... )
And she’s having an affair with Evelyn’s husband.
Now, the cheating bastard is dead, and both Caldwell wives have a mess to clean up.
Good thing Evelyn Caldwell is used to getting her hands dirty.
Key notes: Murder, conspiracy, human experimentation, people are the real monstersEarlier this week, with 22 minutes left on my Libby check-out, I finished The Space Between Worlds by Micaiah Johnson. This is an SFF book about Caramenta, a young woman who travels to different parallel universes to gather information on their development for her employer, the tech company Eldridge.
In Cara’s world, and many like it, environmental disasters have wreaked havoc on Earth. The population is divided among people who live in domed, climate-controlled cities, and those left to the wasteland. The trick about world-hopping is that you can’t go to a parallel universe where “you” are still alive—so suddenly wastelanders like Cara, who have died over and over again by virtue of their terrible living circumstances, become valuable to Eldridge. Cara is particularly special, because in 325 parallel Earths which Eldridge has reached, she is dead in all but eight of them.
There is a lot of playing with what becomes of people if their circumstances are changed—Cara is especially interested in tracking one parallel version of herself who was adopted into a city family at a young age and how radically different her life is from the other Caras as a result.
The Space Between Worlds is pretty light on the SFF, actually. The world-hopping is really secondary to the issues of race and class that the book focuses on. I enjoyed Cara as a protagonist; she’s self-serving in a way that makes perfect sense given how hard she’s had to fight just to survive, but not cold-hearted. There are moments when you can see how much she wants to be different, softer, kinder, but she doesn’t trust the world not to punch her in the solar plexus if she tries.
She has a struggling romance with Dell, a female coworker born and raised in the city, and it’s tragic watching how the aforementioned race and class issues throw up roadblocks between them. I thought Johnson was occasionally a bit heavy-handed on the subject of Cara’s yearning for Dell, but on the whole this aspect was fun to watch play out.
The book was engaging all the way through and I always wanted to see how things turned out, but I’m not totally sold on the later third or so of the plot. I can’t decide if the ending was anticlimactic or just realistic. I did like the book, but something about the final big plot point just didn’t fully land for me.
Overall, a fun read.
On Tuesday after finishing my last book, and with no library holds ready, I dug through our shelves for one I’ve been meaning to get around to, Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened by Jessica S. Henry. I finished this last night.
This is an examination of the phenomenon of a person being convicted of a crime that didn’t happen within the American criminal justice system. Some examples in the book include being charged with arson over a naturally-occurring fire, with drug possession when there were no drugs present, and, bizarrely, with the murder of a child who never existed.
Often, this happens because an incident is initially mislabeled a crime, and everyone just rolls with that. And if there’s a crime, there must be a perpetrator.
If you’ve already studied the criminal justice system, or the legal system more broadly, there’s not much here that’s going to shock. Police with confirmation biases, overworked public defenders, prosecutors desperate to look “tough on crime,” defendants ready to plead guilty to something they didn’t do just to get out of jail pending trial, and judges who are being forced to wear too many hats all contribute to this tragic situation. I do think Henry lays it all out in neat order though, so that even if you knew about these things before, it might be clarifying to see how she puts it together.
I do think it’s something everyone should have at least passing awareness of. Popular media has hammered home that when something feels off, it is off. Humans put enormous stock in our “hunches” and intuition, which, when it comes to other people, are very often wrong. And if you are someone in a position of power—a prosecutor, say—that wrong hunch you’re committed to can cause real harm.
Henry digs into the ways in which even people trained to detect lies rarely bat above a 60% average in correctly guessing when someone is lying. This allows false accusers to be taken seriously while genuine protestations of innocence are ignored—things that could be resolved elsewhere, but once the people working the case become convinced they know the story, it’s very hard to shake them.
She also takes a swing at forensic science, which is tainted by unrealistic claims of accuracy, practitioners who simply make things up, and the failure of judges and juries to understand the real limitations or pitfalls of the various branches (for instance, “bite mark analysis” has been proven to be almost total bunk, but is frequently still admitted in courts; and juries rarely hear about the fallibility of drug-sniffing dogs).
The book can be slightly repetitive, although I did actually appreciate Henry reminding me who a given defendant we’d talked about earlier was, since there are so many of them we hear about in the book. It’s obviously well-researched and Henry, a former public defender, is passionate about the topic and educating the public. Most people are aware that defendants are sometimes convicted of things they didn’t do, but I think there is much less awareness that people can and do plead guilty to things that never even happened, due to the pressures of the system. A guilty plea is perhaps the most damning piece of evidence you can submit to a jury—but it’s not nearly as definitive as we’d like to think.